Pages

And then they came for the caffeine

High street coffee shops could pose a risk to pregnant women because of big variations in the amount of caffeine in each cup, research suggests.

Research always 'suggests' that it is the retailer who may harm the consumer, never that the consumers personal choices may be harmful to themselves. It's those greedy corporations targeting the vulnerable who are unable to decide on purchases for themselves. Now it's 'Big Coffee' forcing pregnant women to enter their shops and drink their wares.

If caffeine is harmful to unborn babies, it's up to the pregnant woman not to drink it, just like they may choose to stay away from cigarettes or alcohol, yet I can see another call for government regulation coming up; another demand for regulations that will stifle business even further in the interests of 'public health'.


Analysis of espresso coffee from 20 shops found that one was six times stronger than others.
Researchers from Glasgow University tested caffeine levels in espressos bought from high street coffee shops.
"The analysis that we did showed the amount of caffeine ranged from 50mg per cup from Starbucks, up to over 300mg per cup from another coffee house, Patisserie Francoise," he said. "I was very surprised by this."
Different coffee houses make their drinks in different ways. They all come from those big machines with different styles from shop to shop, and they all use different types of coffee, whose caffeine content varies across brands. If you tested Sainsburys basics coffee against Nescafe Gold Blend you would see a big difference in caffeine content.

"The problem comes with people who should have a limited caffeine intake.
"You metabolise caffeine much more slowly when you're pregnant and people with liver disease do not have the enzymes to metabolise caffeine.
"Our data shows that you can have the recommended amount - and more - from just one shot of espresso."
I have a limited caffeine intake. I wouldn't dream of drinking a coffee in one of these trendy new Starbucks and associated places. Not just because I find that style of coffee vile, but because I'm aware that the caffeine content is far higher than your basic instant from a tin and I need to watch what I drink. I am quite capable of monitoring my own caffeine intake and staying away from coffee shops for my own health reasons, as I'm sure pregnant women and anyone else who needs to watch their intake are. What we don't need is the state stepping in to look after us.
The researchers point out that despite the increasing number of coffee shops on the high street there is no information about the caffeine contents of various types of coffee.
Oh. Someone thinks we do.

Demanding the coffee shops put caffeine counts on their products will increase costs that will be passed on to the consumer. It will also take away the customers need to think, dumbing them down even further and opening the gates for people to sue coffee shops after having ill effects from 'not noticing' the caffeine counts and drinking far too much of the stuff.
This is a perfect opening for a fake charity fighting against caffeine. Is anyone going to step up?

Or you could just leave businesses alone to sell their products without interference, and consumers alone to make their own choices. Huh?

17 Comments:

Angry Exile said...

Sure enough... Must admit I thought we had a bit longer before things got to this stage. I only started mentioning the threat to coffee drinkers a few months back, and just in passing as a bit of a joke. Of course since then we had the energy drink thing so coffee was bound to come under attack sooner or later. Oxygen will be next - have you seen what the fucking stuff does to iron? Rusting the blood of chiiiiiildren is wrong, we must put carrier bags on their heads immediately to protect them.

FFS!

Bucko said...

Now that's a public health campaign I could get behind :-)

PJH said...

"Not just because I find that style of coffee vile, but because I'm aware that the caffeine content is far higher than your basic instant from a tin..."

The need to have a second mortgage in order to purchase stuff from them wasn't in your list Bucko?

Barman said...

It was that wanker Naughtie on Today this morning that annoyed me most - almost hysterical that one shop should be six times more than another and salivating at the thought of regulation.

Utter tosser.

George Speller said...

Damn right! I want a caffeine count! How else am I going to know if I'm getting my money's worth? :-)

Anonymous said...

Starbucks, Costa, Cafe Nero - they are all the same; MacDonalds for the middle class.

Note to people, if you are out with your screaming kids, take them to a fucking McDonalds, not a coffee shop. At least let me enjoy my latte and lemon & poppy seed muffin in peace.

Angry Exile said...

Poppy seed muffin? That's fourth hand heroin use, isn't it? Or is that what I got from reading that? I forget...

Bucko said...

PJH - Yes, that too. It's like buying designer clothes and paying extra for the name.
You can get a decent sized brew from Maggies Tea Room for less than aquid.

Barman - I didn't see that but I'm familliar with the type. I hate folk like that for the damage they do to businesses and society, just to inflate their own petty egos.

George - Count or no count, you're definately not getting your moneys worth :-)

Henry - You big puff!

Dioclese said...

Anyone who thinks you can get decent coffe out of a cardboard cup is seriously deluded.

I know where I'm getting mine! > http://dioclese.blogspot.com/2011/11/nespresso-aspirational-lifestyle.html

I understand Costa are introducing a Soylent Green flavour shortly.

And I bet George Clooney doesn't go to Starbucks either...

Must go - time for a coffee!

Anonymous said...

What sort of numpty would buy a coffee from Starfucks, anyway!?

Costa's is okay; at least I can afford the mortgage on it, there is a service, and there is enough caffeine in it to give a kick.

Prefer M&S, actually.

RSP

Tattyfalarr said...

Angry Exile said:"Oxygen will be next - have you seen what the fucking stuff does to iron?
...

Brilliant....stolen for use in local newspapers rabid anti-smoker comments. Love it.

Anonymous said...

This is all part of the "we hate Starbucks, the evil corporation because they are successful and pay taxes" nonsense.

Last time I checked, starbucks offered me coffee that I am free to decline, the government by contrast, sticks a gun in my face and demands my money and compliance, so really, which one is evil?

Make that expresso to go.

Bucko said...

SAOT - "Which one is evil" To me that's a no brainer but I bet those who were off work yesterday would disagree

PJH said...

Bucko: "but I bet those who were off work yesterday would disagree"

Which ones? The minority (of the pittance of the 22% who actually bothered to vote for the strike) or the majority who took the opportunity to help increase Wednesday's sales by 7%? (Telegraph had one teacher boasting she got the last xmas pud from Waitrose - since she didn't vote for the strike she felt entitled to go shopping since her school was closed.)

Anonymous said...

So cafeine MAY damage your foetus
So alcohol MAY damage your foetus
So tobacco MAY damage your foetus
So abortion WILL kill your foetus
Oh but just a minute,termination is a womans FREEDOM TO CHOOSE.?.?.?
Just what pathetic depth can a
human society sink to.

A distant drum

Bucko said...

PJH - The ones over there on the left.
I suppose if you work is shut and you are not on strike you may as well take advantage of the extra time :-)

nominedeus said...

Nice one anon "womans choice" eh! lol
Coffee it has to be black..ooops can you still say that? its so delightfully un PCEEEE intit!
Banning coffee won't affect me much but it will certainly affect the bastards that ban it when I get hold of them...Ohhhh yes we addicted can substitute addictions quite happily, now then... "how do you like your pain 'double shot'? minister of banning things!"