In his Autumn Statement on Tuesday Mr Osborne said he was worried about the impact of some EU rules on UK firms and warned against pricing "British business out of the world economy".
"If we burden them with endless social and environmental goals - however worthy in their own right - then not only will we not achieve those goals, but the businesses will fail, jobs will be lost, and our country will be poorer," he said.
So is he finally going to get rid of green taxes and bird mincer supplements?
Nope
He is talking about bird habitats. Fair enough, EU rules regarding conservation may be stifling business, I don't know as it's not really something I've looked at, although EU rules do tend to do more harm than good.
George Osborne told MPs he wanted to make sure that "gold plating of EU rules on things like habitats" were not putting "ridiculous costs" on firms.It's a fine sentiment but I'm sure you've got bigger fish to fry. If you really care about ridiculous costs burdening firms, why not have a word with this muppet from your own party who wants to regulate hairdressers?
I'm always in favour of de-regulation, but the current powers who like to talk an awful lot, have a terrible track record for actually doing anything. Usually they add more regulations rather than take them away.
Like I said, I don't know anything about EU environmental regulations but I'll bet the birdie charities will be up in arms.
Wildlife charities say news of a review of EU rules protecting habitats is "very alarming" and could water down vital protections for wildlife.Although Osborne does have some backing.
Charities said important protections should not be "brushed aside".
It took a lot of hard work and effort, an awful lot of time to get that legislation in the first place - but just to brush it aside now, after 20 years of success, is incredibly alarming”
RSPB conservation director Martin Harper told BBC Radio 4 the charity was "still reeling" from Tuesday's announcement and said the chancellor's rhetoric was "incredibly unhelpful".
Mr Osborne was backed by Country Land and Business Association vice president Harry Cotterell, who told BBC Radio 4's Farming Today: "We have always had big, big problems with the Habitats Directive and the way it is being implemented in this countryQuite. I often feel that these enviroloons put animal welfare far above human welfare. I'm all for looking after the environment, but there has to be a sensible balance.
"We think it is being over implemented, and we think that this is a very very welcome attempt to possibly melt some of the gold plate on the directive.
"Finally we might see a time when human beings are treated with about the same importance as bats, newts and dormice."
8 Comments:
Ahhh, let 'em squawk!
Shameless self publicity...
It should be obvious that 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of decisions made on this earth (probable underestimate) are made for human beings and not all the other animals who share the planet. Still, keep on thinking 'outside the box' you little conservative lickspittle.
Tosserhunter again. I wrote that post with a big smile on my face, didn;t put any smileys in, read it back and it seems like an awful internet troll rant. It wasn't meant to be, and I apologise, Have a good day Mr. Moose.(And it's outside the herd, not the box, dammit!)
If that post sounded like I am a fan of Osborne or any of the others, it wasn't meant to because I'm not.
However I'm not a fan of EU diktats that control British business and people either.
Conservation is fine but it often goes to far. We can't just do as we please and crap all over the environment but we can't let green issues take unnecessary control either.
We need to strike a balance and we need to do it ourselves without EU intervention.
Regulations often cost business money without actually affecting the problem they are supposed to solve
Post a Comment