Gun control





Once again we have another tragedy in the news and this one, for Britain, is a particularly tragic but fortunately rare one.
I'm not here to comment on the tragedy, only the possible consequences. The last time something comparable to this happened, it was followed by a public outcry that was in turn followed by a raft of New Labour knee jerk legislation.
We are all aware of the results of the handgun ban. Handgun owners forced to give up the tools of their sport, gun clubs ruined and the British Olympic team forced to practice in another country.
And despite all this, gun crime has increased.
And now its happened again. This time by someone using a licenced shotgun and .22 rifle. I havent seen it yet but there are bound to be calls for shotguns and rifles to be banned. Maybe even as I am typing this it will be starting. The general public who have been conditioned by 13 years of nannyism will definately call for "action". Freinds and family of the victims will want to ensure that "this never happens again". At the risk of sounding heartless, victims families are rarely objective. And I'm sure there are one or two anti gun pressure groups out there who will be wringing their hands with glee.

The question is, how will the new governement respond to all this? We know what Labour would have done. What will the ConDems do? Are they really the party of liberty or are they just another bunch of knee jerkers?

I'm sure we will find out very soon.

As Anna Raccoon so rightly said, " If Mr Bird had run into just one person carrying a concealed firearm, how many lives could have been saved? "

Is this a sentiment that the government will agree with? I doubt it.

I was discussing with Captain Ranty and LordHutton , the other day, about the benefits of owning a shotgun. Lord H provided us with all the info we need to get licenced and get a shotgun. I wonder how much more difficult that process will get now. Or even if it will be possible at all.

Read more: http://www.annaraccoon.com/#ixzz0pmE30s9v

Moose music of the week

Retard sues Google


A big h/t to Al Jahom for spotting this dose of tomfoolery.




Google sued over crash route

A woman is suing Google after claiming its maps application gave her directions to a motorway where she was run over.
Lauren Rosenberg (Complete Biff) is seeking more than £70,000 in damages from the internet search engine claiming they were directly at fault for the accident.
Mrs Rosenberg used Google maps in January last year to get directions by foot to a pal's house.
The application told her to walk for half a mile along "Deer Valley Drive" — which turned out to be a section of the Utah State Route 224 — a motorway with no pavements.

I remember a saying the teachers used to use when I was at primary school, "If X told you to jump under a bus, would you do it?"
If Google told you to "Go play on a motorway", would you do it?

The case claims that Mrs Rosenberg wasn't warned about this by Google — making them responsible.

What a complete retard! She walks onto a fucking motorway, but Google are responsible because they didn't warn her? Big fucking motorway! Very big. Lots of nasty cars. Very noisey. You don't need fucking warning that, that might not be the safest thing to do!

The driver of the car involved in the collision, Patrick Harwood, is also named in the suit, Rosenberg v Harwood.

Of course he is. /facepalm

Both Harwood and Google are being sued in the same case, for damages 'in excess of $100,000'.
Google say the directions came with a warning for pedestrians — but Mrs Rosenberg claimed her Blackberry screen was too small to display the caution.


And whose fucking fault is that!
I'm off to put some ice cubes down my pants- my piss is boiling.

Score for the Thought Police

From The Lancashire Telegraph

Dozens in East Lancs reported to anti-terror hotline

DOZENS of people have been reported to police as part of a new scheme to root out potential terrorists in East Lancashire.
The Channel Project aims to prevent 'vulnerable people' becoming radicalised.
It encourages citizens to report any 'worrying behaviour' - such as a schoolboy drawing pictures of bombs or bus passengers spouting extremist views - to a special hotline.

This entire scheme makes my skin crawl. Encouraging citizens to spy and report on each other?

Police then complete background checks on individuals before a panel meets to decide if any action needs to be taken.
Interventions can range from a simple chat to a complex mentoring and counselling process.

And what happens if the police approach someone for an informal chat and get told to fuck off? Do they go away? I doubt it.

Critics said the Channel Project was a step too far in terms of civil liberties. They said it could cause fear in communities.
But police said it was 'not about spying, but identifying vulnerable people and helping them'.

WTF? How does being reported to the authorities as a potential terrorist help you?

Blackburn and Burnley are two of 28 national pilot schemes launched last November after concerns that many neighbours in Leeds had suspicions about the 7/7 London bombers but did not report anything to police.
Dozens of East Lancashire people, the majority aged between 15 and 24, have been reported to police for having either extremist Islamic views, far-right leanings and or being IRA sympathisers.

IRA sympathisers???
Far right leanings? According to the political spectrum quiz, I have far right leanings. Does that mean I am due an 'informal chat'? Are people not entitled to their views in a free society, no matter how barking they may be?

The information has not prompted any criminal investigations.

So its doing well then? Are people just reporting folk because they dont like them?

So far the scheme has relied on tip-offs from people in public sector jobs, such as teachers, social workers and bin men, or workers who come into contact with the public a lot, such as bus drivers.
But now police are urging the wider community to report their concerns to the hotline.
Examples of the types of behaviour that could be reported include:

• A bus passenger expressing racist views

How do you report a bus passenger? How do you even know who they are? And again, are people not entitled to their veiws as long as they are not harming anyone?

• New neighbours behaving oddly, such as keeping curtains shut all day

I keep my curtains shut all day. The sun glares on the telly. I am worried now.

• A vulnerable loner who suddenly gets a large group of new friends.

Maybe he has met some folk down the pub. Good luck to him.

Inspector Paul Goodall, the Prevent and Channel co-ordinator for East Lancashire, said the project aimed to target those with 'extremist views’.
He said: “We are looking at people who would not normally come onto our radar.
“In their behaviour they may not actually be doing anything wrong, but if we have concerns about how they could develop, it is our role to engage with that person.

Is it now the role of the police and the state to target and interfere with those who have committed no crimes? How can you target someone incase they commit a crime in the future? Its not the Minority Report

“This is a massive change for us because these people are not criminals.
“We hope and expect that the numbers of referrals will increase.”
Jack Straw , Blackburn MP, said a fine balance needed to be found to protect the public and not infringe on people’s privacy.
Mr Straw, the former Justice Minister, said: “The horror of terrorism is that the victims are chosen at random and as someone who was involved in an IRA attack in the 1970s I know that it is one of those areas that the police cannot ignore.

As someone involved in the IRA attacks in the 70s do you remember that there were no terrorist hotlines, no ID cards, no DNA databases and no government and media scaremongering whatsoever. Did Margaret Thatcher not say,

Democratic nations must try to find ways to starve the terrorist and the hijacker of the oxygen of publicity on which they depend
And for final measure:

Partners in the Channel scheme locally are the Prince's Trust, Samaritans, councils and football teams and the youth inclusion support panel.

The Youth Inclusion Support Panel? WTF is the Youth Inclusion Support Panel? Sounds like another one for Camerons Bonfire of the quangos

For more information or to report anyone to the Channel team call 01254 353666 or the anti-terrorism hotline on 0800 789 321. (And ask them what the fuck they think they are playing at)

If you're reading this it means I am dead....

It seems there has been a lot to blog about this bank holiday weekend.

The North Koreans are ready to go to war with the South

The Israelies have shot some people

David Laws has resigned

ASH has released a comedy anti smoking report

And where was I during all this opportunity? Pissed. At Darwen music festival.
And what a cracker of a day that was. We saw everything from a jazz piano trio to a dixieland band doing ACDC covers. I suffered for it on Monday though. I must be too old for all that boozing, now

Oh well. Its not like anyone reads my drivvel yet anyway.
For now, I think I'll go on the Telegraph site and give some lefties some pain. That usually brightens my day.