Pages

Those anti-smoking Canadians

I've been passed another link* to yesterdays story about a crackpot Canadian family who believe cigarette smoke from their neighbours yard is dangerous to their health.

This story is extremely bizarre, yet the craziest thing about it is the truly amazing things these people are willing to believe. Like this:
"When they're smoking there, it does not stop at the fence. It goes over and gets sucked right into our home," said Rena Krossa, whose townhouse in a new Maple Ridge subdivision sits less than three metres from her neighbours'.
I don't know how much their neighbours smoke, but hellfire, it must be an awful lot for that statement to be true.

Of course it isn't true though. I'm sure they believe that cigarette smoke is that potent, but it isn't.
"I'm totally feeling frustrated and helpless because I cannot keep my kids safe in their own home," she said.
Your kids are fine! Do you make them wear gas masks when outdoors, to protect them from all the other nasty stuff in the air?

Worrying like that will bring you out in hives.
Ernie Daykin, the mayor of Maple Ridge, says provincial and municipal bylaws are silent on the issue of smoking on patios or backyards.

"It's really difficult. How do you regulate somebody in their back yard?

Notice the language from the authority figure there?

Not, "We shouldn't regulate somebody in their backyard", but, "How do we....?"

The Mayor is actually taking these people on board. He would like to regulate, but can't. Yet.

It's not really difficult, it's very simple. You tell these muppets to get a life and stop wasting your time.
People feel they're over-regulated to begin with," Daykin said
Not "People are over regulated", but... Well, you get the point.
In a letter to Premier Christy Clark and Mayor Daykin, Wendell Krossa notes that his campaign is not about "picking on smokers" or interfering with their right to smoke in their own yards.
No. That's exactly what it's about. There can be no other reason for this. You hate smokers and you want your fifteen minutes in the papers.

Your arguments about the dangers of your neighbours smoking are obvious bollocks. This is about picking on smokers. Nothing more.
"To the contrary, this is about smokers violating non-smoker’s rights to a safe and healthy life. Smokers violate such rights by not taking proper care when expelling their toxins into other’s property and lungs," he wrote.
Tobacco smoke is not a toxin. Smokers are not 'expelling' it into your property and certainly not your lungs. When smoking in the open air, the smoke is almost instantly diluted and disappears.
Across the province, anti-smoking groups say at least 500,000 British Columbians are exposed to unwanted second-hand smoke in their homes.
Another made up and undisputed quote. With a population of 4.4 million in British Columbia, that's over ten percent of the population suffering from other peoples smoke making it into their homes.

The anti-smokers in Canada must be almost as loopy as our lot.
Vancouver lawyer Ron Usher says anti-smoking laws are not as clear as they should be.
The challenge for legislators, Usher said, is to balance the rights and freedoms of people on private property with the need to safeguard others from harm.
Smokers are not causing others harm. The antis just don't want to get that.



*Thanks to Ann W in the comments

5 Comments:

Anonymous said...

One person is full of hate and is raging on the insides over the other for smoking in their yard. They want to control and even kill that next door neighbor, if they could get away with it. Because of current laws, thus far it is not yet legal to kill them. But they want to hide their feelings from other people who would find it hideous to think someone hated their next door neighbor and wanting to kill them, so they instead try couching their motivations behind false guises - and how when once one lies, one has to lie again and again, each time a bigger lie than the last - they eventually turn it into a righteous campaign for health, when it's really just a disguised personal and selfish campaign against their neighbors, whom they secretly hate, and will settle for the next best thing, which is being vindicated internally by imposition of another ban, taking away of someone else's rights, in which case then the original hatred they felt all along, and hid, will somehow go away and they will feel normal again and sanctified from ever having enacted any sins, namely destroying the joy and happiness of their neighbors and without having to go to jail for committing murder, which is their real intent all along. If one were to try to psychoanalyze a bit of how these antismoking fanatics think, that might be how they work on the inside, motivated by internal hatred and desire to control others, but too ashamed to admit to the outside world or else restricted by antimuder laws from acting out what they really want deep deep inside.

Ann W. said...

"The anti-smokers in Canada must be almost as loopy as our lot."

LOL

My take on all of this is that our anti-smokers are in a crusade to ban smoking from all multi dwelling untis (MUDS).

This includes any residence that share a common wall or floor. To climb over the "private property" hurled they have been working really hard with public housing.
Personally I think this is just a test to see if they can go after private housing yet.

They have already set up a website at: http://www.smokefreehousing.ca/
and by clicking on a province you can also access the province websites.

JuliaM said...

They'll win eventually, I fear. Too many people just don't see the start of the slippery slope until it's too late...

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.