Get a load of this.
The BHF found almost one in three children is eating sweets
OMG! It's the end of civilisation as we know it!
Sounds a bit like my childhood. It's hardly a binge, I'm living proof of that. I love the way these charities use emotive words like binge, in order to make their crappy messages sound like they actually mean something.NINE out of 10 British children are ignoring healthy eating messages to binge on energy drinks, crisps and chocolate every day.BHF dietitian Victoria TaylorA survey by the British Heart Foundation found the typical daily diet of 11-to-16-year-olds includes a packet of crisps, a chocolate bar, a bag of chewy jelly sweets, a fizzy drink and an energy drink.
Only one in 10 said they were eating the recommended five portions of fruit and veg every day.We're talking about children here. Not many adults bother with that five-a-day rubbish. Children tend to be very active (when the nanny state lets them), so eating a bit of crap is not going to do much harm. If they really were binging rather than just 'eating sweets', there might actually be a problem. Emotive language has moved far from it's original meaning under the last fourteen years of socialism.
The charity warned the alarming snack diet – loaded with fat, salt and sugar – means a whole generation is at risk of long-term health problems of obesity, diabetes and heart disease.There you go again. These kids diets are not loaded with fat, salt and sugar. Kids are eating healthier now than they have ever done in the past. The problem is, fake charities are bigger and more influential than they have ever been in the past, and every fake charity needs a fake problem to solve.
The BHF found almost one in three children is eating sweets, chocolate and crisps three or more times a day and 40 per cent normally have fizzy or energy drinks during the day.So two thirds of children are not eating sweets, chocolate and crisps, and 60 percent don't touch fizzy drinks? Sounds a lot better than when I was a kid, although I've nothing against these foods being consumed in moderation. I have a bad of crisps a day at work; I sometimes splash out and have a snickers bar too. My health is fine, and I'm not burning calories at anywhere near the rate that children do.
Only 31 per cent eat fruit at lunch, compared with 34 per cent who say they tuck into crisps.I would have though persuading 31 percent of children to eat fruit would be considered an achievement. Obviously it doesn't 'go far enough'.
The charity is launching a Food4Thought campaign to tackle childhood obesity which now affects almost a third of England’s youngsters.So the BHF is about to launch yet another nannying campaign whose aim is to hector kids and parents to conform to an approved lifstyle? I would say that's the last time I spend my money in a BHF charity shop, but I did that a long time ago when I found they donate money to ASH.
12 Comments:
OMG! Sweets! Kids eating sweets! We're all gonna die.
When did this new and terrifying trend start? We should be told before we all die from second hand sugar.
Ever since:
Sugar, ah honey honey,
You are my candy girl,
And you've got me wanting you.
Honey, ah sugar sugar,
You are my candy girl,
And you've got me wanting you.
It's all gone wrong.
Why oh why can't there be a song that goes:
Five, ah five a day
You are my veggie girl
And you've got me wanting you...
and so on (copyright: Sozialist Musik Ltd)
And didn't she say that we should binge out on eggs because they contain loadsa potassium, which even though she isn't quite sure what it does to the body it must be good because the word contains 4 syllables and, oh yeah, bugger the cholesterol. Because eggs contain nice middle class cholesterol not that horrid council house stuff.
And didn't she warn us against eating chocolate because "it is packed with saturated fat and calories.” and we should limit our intake to "one square of chocolate a day or half a small chocolate Easter egg in a week" because " that whilst antioxidants in chocolate may be helpful to your heart, they can also be found in fruit and veg – foods which don’t come with the saturated fat and high calories that chocolate does,” even though research carried out by her colleagues at the BHF found that "a high level of chocolate consumption was associated with a 33 per cent reduction in someone’s risk of developing heart and circulatiory (sic) disease."?
And didn't she also warn us "that consuming fried fish and chips even once a week increases the risk of heart failure."?
And didn't she also caution us against eating sausages because we're not sure "how much salt could be in our favourite sausages" ?
And didn't she also warn against fizzy drinks by hectoring: "Aside from blood pressure, we do know sugary drinks will add extra calories to our diets and excess calories can lead to obesity, a major risk factor for heart disease"?
And didn't she also advise against eating "margarines, cakes and fast food"?
And wasn't her that said that cabbages "are are not an effective way to lose weight and can cause fatigue and constipation"
And correct me if I'm wrong but isn't she a committed vegetarian? And from the looks of her photo http://www.bhf.org.uk/images/victoria%20taylor_thumbnail.jpg about 22 years old?
Anyway by all means go and chat on her blog: http://www.bhf.org.uk/media/news-from-the-bhf/salty-bread-blog.aspx and tell she is NOT an interfering busybody.
Kevin - Hell fire! She said all that? Obviously she has no clue at all what she is on about, just spouting rubbish that she thinks sounds good.
Is there anything we can eat that isn't fruit or veg? Oh yeah, shes a veggie, so no then.
I'll take a look at that blog later. Hopefully there will be opportunity for some pain giving :-)
http://tinyurl.com/c9hc2jp
Probably not.
Forbidden fruit is always tempting; forbidden sugar is totally irresistible.
Post a Comment