Pages

Another arrest for defending property. Apparently.

Watchmaker is held for attempted murder after 'blasting burglar with shotgun during raid by two intruders at rural home'

A watchmaker has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder after a suspected burglar was allegedly shot in the leg during a botched raid in a quiet rural village.

The details in this article are very sketchy, but on face value it looks like two men broke into someones home, tried to steal the keys to a car, but one of them was shot by the homeowner. He has now been arrested for attempted murder.

Assuming that's what happened, I ask again, why are the police insistent on arresting these people for defending themselves?

There have been three recent high profile cases of burglars being knifed to death by homeowners, two of whom have been released without charge. They were arrested on a charge of murder. This man hasn't killed his attacker, only wounded him, yet still he was arrested on the biggest charge possible, attempted murder.

I would argue that a man who fired a shotgun at an intruder and only gave him a non life threatening leg would was specifically attempting not to commit murder.

The Police obviously think differently. They really hate members of the public doing their jobs for them because they believe they have the monopoly on crime prevention and defence.

They even had a word in The Boiling Frogs ear just for sitting on a burglar.

Like I said, the details are sketchy, there will probably be more to come.

One thing that does spring out of the article is the polices assurances to the public that this is a one off and they are in no danger.

'I wish to reassure local residents that this is a contained incident: we have people in custody and we believe there is no further threat to the public in the area.'

'Police remain in Leigh Sinton and Whitbourne conducting house-to-house inquiries and forensic investigations, and providing reassurance to local residents.

'I would like to reiterate that residents are not at any risk.

You know the reason for this don't you. This was a shooting, an incident with a firearm and probably a legal one. Visions of Raul Moat and Derek Bird, nut jobs on the rampage with guns. That's how the police want us to think, that all guns are bad and all guns should be banned.

Don't worry good citizens, the police are there to defend you from nasty shotgun toting homeowners.

13 Comments:

The Filthy Engineer said...

I own a shot gun. I would not hesitate to use it to protect my family. (except the wife. She snores you know). if someone wants to take the risk of breaking into my property, then they should have to take the risk of me discharging shot into the extermities of my choice.

The Travelling Toper said...

Reading thearticle I have to be impressed by the way the plod manages to disrupt the entire area even though it's a fairly open and shut case. The picture of the thugs on their knees searching for heaven knows what sums it up perfectly. What a bunch of arseholes.

Monty Cristo said...

I'd argue that if someone fired a shotgun at an intruder and it resulted in a non-life threatening wound then he's a bloody crap shot. If you feel threatened enough to shoot an intruder do it correctly. Doesn't make him a bad person though, just a minging shot (unless he was shaking a mite at the time):)

Bucko said...

FE - I own one too. It would have to be a really serious incident before I used it on a burglar, not because I don't want to kill one but because I'm scared of going to prison. If I was forced to use it though, it would be a kill shot.

Travelling Toper - I think that's part of their scare tactics to make the general public terrified of guns

Monty - He might not be a bad shot, he might be a very good shot who watches too much TV drama

JuliaM said...

"Don't worry good citizens, the police are there to defend you from nasty shotgun toting homeowners."

Remember, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away!

Pavlov's Cat said...

Typical DM anti-gun headline, never say 'shot' when you can say 'BLASTED'


and damn Julia beat me to the quote I was going to use

Anonymous said...

'Britons grow balls' would be a good headline for this sort of public spirited act

JuliaM said...

"...I ask again, why are the police insistent on arresting these people for defending themselves?"

Because we're doing them out of a job?

Not that they're actually doing that job themselves, mind you.

Bucko said...

Julia - True dat.

Pavlovs Cat - Yes they love their scary words. They are as much a part of the 'guns are bad' crown as the police.

Mud in the Blood - Not in our lifetime mate

Julia (Mark 2) - When the original idea of a police force was thought of, were they not there to assist the public where needed? Now they have taken over ever aspect of law enforcement and are the only people with a recognised right to armed defence. And they're a bunch of C%$£

Pavlov's Cat said...

ah , oooops I'm all in favour of defending your home.

Defending your large scale cannabis growing operation, not so much

Police find 'large-scale cannabis cultivation' at country home where clockmaker was arrested for shooting 'burglar' in the leg

Bucko said...

Ahh, Mr Cat, the plot thickens.

I won't go into my views on the drug laws but the rights and wrongs of all this depend on weather the canabis had anything to do with it.

If it was part of some drug war then we cant condone those actions but if it was a simple burglary and act of self defence then fair play to him.

A 'large scale growing operation' could simply be a few pots in the greenhouse to help his arthritis.

TPTB want us all to think that guns = bad. What better way to get that message accross than mix guns with drugs?

Man who grows a few plants shoots burglar in self defence doesn't really give that message. Add 'large scale growing operation' and 'blasted!' and you're getting there.

TheBoilingFrog said...

Cheers for the link Bucko. Is that now 3 dead burglars this year without charge for the householder? Excellent.

Bucko said...

Yes TBF, three dead and counting.