Pages

Missing the point on disability

The BBC are running a story on cuts to disability benefit.

In true BBC style, it's emotional, factually incorrect and designed to make us think cuts to the public sector will be the downfall of civilisation.

It includes quotes from this woman


with a sob story about her severely disabled son who will not be able to function without government money.

The trouble is, they are reporting about the wrong people. They should be running a story about my mate, we'll call him Burt.

Burt used to drink in one of the pubs I used to work in. I still see him often when I'm down the pub and we've become friends. Burt used to be a landlord himself and he is a raging alcoholic. He tells me that when he ran a pub he used to drink thirty pints a day. I find that a bit impossible but these alcoholics can achieve some amazing drinking feats.

He also has epilepsy, and by his own admission, this condition was brought on by his excessive drinking.

Apparently he wants to work (I don't believe that for a minute) but he can't get a job because of his epilepsy. Something to do with insurance.

This man gets more money off the government than I have ever earned in a full time job.

Quote from the BBC article:
"The human rights act says individuals have a right to a quality of life, the whole purpose of the DLA is to put them on an equal playing field with everyone else.

"Any proposal that fails to appreciate those fundamental rights could find it is an infringement of the law.

Paying this man a bigger wage than the average full time worker, is not putting him on an equal playing field, it's elevating him above the playing field of everyone else, the very people who work to pay for his booze.

I've always made my feelings clear on his benefit payments and he has always agreed. At the end of the day, as far as he is concerned he is getting the money and will continue to do so, so my opinions matter not.

Another chap I met in the pubs was receiving three hundred and five pounds a week on disability benefit, plus all his bills, rent, council tax etc, paid for him.

I told him my opinion of that and he said, "If you woke up with a chest like mine every morning you would understand". I said I probably would wake up with his chest if I blew 305 quid per week on fags and booze as he does, and no I wouldn't understand. (This man drinks Stella in the shower in the mornings)

The BBC are telling us that cuts to disability benefits are a bad thing while parading the severely disabled in front of us to make their case.

It's people like these alcoholics with self inflicted disability that should lose their money, and it's people like these that the BBC should be reporting.

Another quote from the article:

Charities including Disability Alliance claim the proposals are not about simplifying the system but are about removing 380,000 claimants from it.

Target the right claimants and you could easily remove 380,000 and then some.

And tell the charities to fuck the fuck off.

7 Comments:

JuliaM said...

"It's people like these alcoholics with self inflicted disability that should lose their money, and it's people like these that the BBC should be reporting."

YES!!!!

And we know why they won't...

Roger Thornhill said...

This is the problem of entitlements. Because the distributor of the money did not earn it and dies not really own the wealth, you have to have such systems and such systems can and are "played". If the money was being handed out at the discretion of those who earned it,the lady and her son would not be so threatened and the blokes you mention would have the incentive to get a grip as the access to The Money Tree would be curtailed ANSI suspect those handing over charity wod begin to make if conditional. NO! I do NOT want te state to get conditional - that is playing into the Fabians' hands by endowing the state with more arbitrary power. The very activity of state welfare is dysfunctional.

Miss Ben E Fit said...

Very thought provoking piece. Read it twice will read it again

Johnnydub said...

The BBC do exactly the same thing with the single mum debate - they pull on a Surrey Yummy Mummy who's husbna ddied young from Cancer or some such.

Yes that Surrey Mummy is really in the middle of the bell curve as reagrds lifetyle etc correct?

Anonymous said...

*war story mode _ON_*

I always heard about stories of fairly functional people living comfortably on 'the sick'. However I actually saw a DSS letter recently - it described the addressee in terms that I did not initially recognise (I thought that it was referring to their infirm parent).

If the DSS can make such errors, then the DLA needs to be reviewed. Although less than a 'full time' professional wage, DLA + other benefits are more than many people that I know earn from full time work.

*war story mode _OFF_*

Bucko said...

Anon - Thats the problem. Not only do they pay more than min wage in DLA, they also pay all bills, rent and council tax, making the claimant better off than most workers

Anonymous said...

oi moose i´ve been in germany for ca 16 years never claimed a penny and worked like lee marvin through thick and thin(two bob millionaire)queued for food,danced with tramps and met chicks with dicks;O)))
but all of the fucks above as you have mentioned need a new mercedes!
did you you know that there are more divorces between smokers than non-smokers!
bild zeitung this morning(fucking not kidding)
CUNTS
BRICKBAT