The Moose: Calling all Catwoman protestors. You're needed elswhere.

Thugs tie up and drown dog

‘DESPICABLE thugs’ drowned a tiny terrier by tying him up while he was still alive and throwing him into a canal in a weighted-down rucksack.

An RSPCA inspector said the killing of 18-month-old terrier Freddie was the worst cruelty he had seen in his career.
The wire-haired terrier was found floating face-down in the Leeds and Liverpool Canal under the bridge off Burnley Road, near to Moorfield Way, Altham.
Tests revealed Freddie was alive when he was thrown in to the water.
Experts said he would have endured a ‘terrible death’.
RSPCA Inspector Mandi Barr said: “This poor little dog never stood a chance.
“This was a deliberate and horrific act of deliberate cruelty and the worst of its kind I have seen in my six years in the job.
"It has upset myself and my colleagues considerably.”
She said the person responsible was a ‘callous and cruel coward’.
“We don’t want them to get away with this,” Insp Barr said.
“This dog has suffered an awful death and someone is responsible for that. Please, if you think you can help, call us.”
“Cruelty to animals like this is unforgiveable. This dog would not have had a clue what was happening to him.
“It is completely unnecessary and horrible.”
The incident happned early on August 2 but the RSPCA has only just released details.

This story is far worse than the crazy catwoman incident. I wonder if it will receive the same response?

6 Comments:

Anonymous said...

The upsurge in animal cruelty stories is more than likely a clandestine campaign by quangoes working under government control to manufacture a state of frenzy among enough people to reach the tipping point from which they can launch a campaign to increase their power over the people as a matter of "necessity". One manufacturers a state of "emergency" by introducing stories of a few harsh animal cruelty stories into the "news" and then the "solution" will be, more control is "needed" - thus tightening the noose a little more. Do that agency by agency, quango by quango and pretty soon, you have a police state, one that everyone has already agreed to during their fit of anger and despair, which was as the perpetrators of every propaganda campaign have conspired to manufacture in the first place. There is probably some boring, dull, smoke-less back-room somewhere that elites in control meet to plot out each month's plan of attack upon the populace, which is duped.

15:03

Bucko said...

Wouldn't put it past 'em

15:36

I am Stan said...

No doubt you are correct anon,however a case of animal cruelty is animal cruelty end of.

I should not just be ignored in the fear that some quango etc will start demanding id chips in all pets or whatever.

16:09

Longrider said...

No, for two reasons; there is no video and there are no identifiable perps.

The crime, however is as wicked.

20:25

As a side comment regarding pets in general, the SPCA, a charitable organization, along with the city/county government officials responsible for animal control in the city/county of San Francisco, California, USA, have recently proposed and perhaps it has been endorsed, to begin soon, a total ban on pet stores selling pets. All citizens wanting a pet will have to obtain one only through the SPCA charity or else the government run department. No private enterprise will be permitted, by rule of law. This is similar to how no pharmacy can sell tobacco in San Francisco and soon tobacco retail licenses will be culled back to a few hundred, and eventually to zero. Everything will be totally government controlled by government paid employees, including pets now, at least on the left-coast of the USofA. It could be that the government there and the charities responsible for taking care of abandoned pets will soon make a plea that only they know what is best for pets and then outlaw privately owned pet stores, as is the case in San Francisco. And that's not to say that tossing a poor cat into a trash bin isn't cruel or shouldn't be dealt with. But the popularization of the story could be a run-up to something like that. Beware of being hit out of left-field by surprise by some totally manufactured "need" one day soon for "government to do something" and that something of course will require a new ban, like in California, on pet stores daring to stock, well, pets, the entire basis of them being in business in the first place. If you think you've seen a lot of pubs closed down recently, you may be seeing a lot of pet stores closed down next, should they take that route, if that's what "they" have planned. I'm forever suspicious, it's because of what I have seen.

17:33

JuliaM said...