Pages

Justice?



Or bad journalism? She hasn't just been sent down for life for a second time, as the title suggests, she had her conviction overturned on appeal, but was found guilty at her retrial

On reading that title I thought, 'she's not a cat', but then
Mr Justice King, sitting at Liverpool Crown Court, recommended that Rachel Tunstill, 26, should serve a minimum 17 years before being considered for parole
She's 26. She could easily be out in time to live another life. Or serve another 'life' sentence

Maybe she is a cat?

2 Comments:

Anonymous said...

This is a really harrowing case.
Liverpool Crown Court heard Tunstill gave birth while her unsuspecting boyfriend Ryan Kelly played computer games in the next room on 14 January 2017.

She told him she was having a miscarriage and asked him for scissors before stabbing Mia 14 times.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-47141508

There is clearly something seriously wrong with the girl - and her boyfriend, too? Is it a case of snowflakes becoming ridiculously inept adults? There is question after question....

He added: "She has still never admitted why she killed Mia."
By the looks of it she doesn't know herself. Snowflakes are incapable of long term thinking. All is NOW and only about them.
The hormonal mess does not kick in until a week after birth and sleep deprivation, so this is no excuse.

Perhaps this case is a good example of how INDIFFERENCE (just commented on Frank's blog post "Omnia Vincit Amor") is the worst.

Beobrigitte

Bucko said...

They could just be batshit crazy products of the nanny state; people who have no idea how to function on their own